Luke
 

Genetic stability of wild pear (Pyrus pyraster, Burgsd) after cryopreservation by encapsulation dehydration

dc.contributor.authorCondello, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorPalombi, Maria Antonietta-
dc.contributor.authorTonelli, Maria Grazia-
dc.contributor.authorDamiano, Carmine-
dc.contributor.authorCaboni, Emilia-
dc.date.accepted2009-07-06-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T11:06:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-31T01:28:53Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T11:06:33Z
dc.date.created2009-06-15-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.date.modifiedUpdated 25.6.2009-
dc.description.abstractShoot tips of Pyrus pyraster were successfully cryopreserved by encapsulation-dehydration. Na--alginate beads each containing one shoot tip, dehydrated for 2 days in 0.75M sucrose and desiccated to 20% moisture content (fresh weight basis), gave 60% recovery after exposure to liquid nitrogen. Regenerated shoots showed no differences in length and leaf shape compared to the mother plant. Multiplication rate and rooting ability of cryopreserved shoots were lower than those of untreated controls after one subculture, but were completely restored following the third subculture. Fifteen cryopreserved lines derived from single buds were used for genetic analyses by RAPDs and SSRs, in comparison with the mother plant. In RAPD analysis, of a total of 24 primers, only 15 showed reproducible and well resolved bands and were further used. These primers produced a total of 66 fragments ranging from about 500 to 2500 base pair size. SSR (microsatellite) marker amplification was performed using 19 primers which produced 57 reproducible fragments. Microsatellites fragments ranged from 60 to 600 base pairs. Both RAPDs and SSRs did not reveal any polymorphism between cryopreserved lines and the original genotype, suggesting that cryopreservation, using encapsulation-dehydration, does not affect genetic stability of wild pear.en
dc.description.accessibilityfeaturefi=ei tietoa saavutettavuudesta-
dc.description.dacok-
dc.description.stav-
dc.formatSekä painettu että verkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange136-143-
dc.format.size469-
dc.identifier.elss1795-1895-
dc.identifier.olddbid416416
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/475434
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/88646
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2015090311183-
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.lseng-
dc.publisherMTT Agrifood Research Finland-
dc.publisherThe Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland-
dc.publisher.placefi-
dc.publisher.placeJokioinen-
dc.publisher.placeHelsinki-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAgricultural and Food Science-
dc.relation.issn1459-6067-
dc.relation.numberinseries2-
dc.relation.volume18-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/475434
dc.subject.finagriPu-
dc.subject.finagriKa-
dc.subject.ftegermplasm preservation-
dc.subject.ftemultiplication ability-
dc.subject.fteRAPDs-
dc.subject.fterooting-
dc.subject.ftesomaclonal variation-
dc.subject.fteSSRs-
dc.subject.ftetissue culture-
dc.titleGenetic stability of wild pear (Pyrus pyraster, Burgsd) after cryopreservation by encapsulation dehydration-
dc.typeb-
dc.type.bib1. Asiantuntijatarkastetut tieteelliset artikkelit-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
mtt-afs-v18n2p136.pdf
Size:
465.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format