Luke

Multispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: A benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithms

dc.contributor.authorTaher, Josef
dc.contributor.authorHyyppä, Eric
dc.contributor.authorHyyppä, Matti
dc.contributor.authorSalolahti, Klaara
dc.contributor.authorYu, Xiaowei
dc.contributor.authorMatikainen, Leena
dc.contributor.authorKukko, Antero
dc.contributor.authorLehtomäki, Matti
dc.contributor.authorKaartinen, Harri
dc.contributor.authorThurachen, Sopitta
dc.contributor.authorLitkey, Paula
dc.contributor.authorLuoma, Ville
dc.contributor.authorHolopainen, Markus
dc.contributor.authorKong, Gefei
dc.contributor.authorFan, Hongchao
dc.contributor.authorRönnholm, Petri
dc.contributor.authorVaaja, Matti
dc.contributor.authorPolvivaara, Antti
dc.contributor.authorJunttila, Samuli
dc.contributor.authorVastaranta, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorPuliti, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorAstrup, Rasmus
dc.contributor.authorKostensalo, Joel
dc.contributor.authorMyllymäki, Mari
dc.contributor.authorKulicki, Maksymilian
dc.contributor.authorStereńczak, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.authorPires, Raul de Paula
dc.contributor.authorValbuena, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorCarbonell-Rivera, Juan Pedro
dc.contributor.authorTorralba, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yi-Chen
dc.contributor.authorWiniwarter, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorHollaus, Markus
dc.contributor.authorMandlburger, Gottfried
dc.contributor.authorTakhtkeshha, Narges
dc.contributor.authorRemondino, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorLisiewicz, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorKraszewski, Bartłomiej
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Xinlian
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jianchang
dc.contributor.authorAhokas, Eero
dc.contributor.authorKarila, Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorVezeteu, Eugeniu
dc.contributor.authorManninen, Petri
dc.contributor.authorNäsi, Roope
dc.contributor.authorHyyti, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorPyykkönen, Siiri
dc.contributor.authorHu, Peilun
dc.contributor.authorHyyppä, Juha
dc.contributor.departmentid4100111010
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310510
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-1256
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-7088
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-11T11:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractClimate-smart and biodiversity-preserving forestry demands precise information on forest resources, extending to the individual tree level. Multispectral airborne laser scanning (ALS) has shown promise in automated point cloud processing, but challenges remain in leveraging deep learning techniques and identifying rare tree species in class-imbalanced datasets. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a comprehensive benchmark of deep learning and traditional shallow machine learning methods for tree species classification. For the study, we collected high-density multispectral ALS data (>1000 pts/m2) at three wavelengths using the FGI-developed HeliALS system, complemented by existing Optech Titan data (35 pts/m2), to evaluate the species classification accuracy of various algorithms in a peri-urban study area located in southern Finland. We established a field reference dataset of 6326 segments across nine species using a newly developed browser-based crowdsourcing tool, which facilitated efficient data annotation. The ALS data, including a training dataset of 1065 segments, was shared with the scientific community to foster collaborative research and diverse algorithmic contributions. Based on 5261 test segments, our findings demonstrate that point-based deep learning methods, particularly a point transformer model, outperformed traditional machine learning and image-based deep learning approaches on high-density multispectral point clouds. For the high-density ALS dataset, a point transformer model provided the best performance reaching an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 87.9% (74.5%) with a training set of 1065 segments and 92.0% (85.1%) with a larger training set of 5000 segments. With 1065 training segments, the best image-based deep learning method, DetailView, reached an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 84.3% (63.9%), whereas a shallow random forest (RF) classifier achieved an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 83.2% (61.3%). For the sparser ALS dataset, an RF model topped the list with an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 79.9% (57.6%), closely followed by the point transformer at 79.6% (56.0%). Importantly, the overall classification accuracy of the point transformer model on the HeliALS data increased from 73.0% with no spectral information to 84.7% with single-channel reflectance, and to 87.9% with spectral information of all the three channels. Furthermore, we studied the scaling of the classification accuracy as a function of point density and training set size using 5-fold cross-validation of our dataset. Based on our findings, multispectral information is especially beneficial for sparse point clouds with 1–50 pts/m2. Furthermore, we observed that the classification error follows a power law ɛ(m)≈m−α as a function of the training set size m, and the classification error of the point transformer reduced significantly faster with increasing training set size compared to RF.
dc.format.pagerange278-309
dc.identifier.citationHow to cite: Josef Taher, Eric Hyyppä, Matti Hyyppä, Klaara Salolahti, Xiaowei Yu, Leena Matikainen, Antero Kukko, Matti Lehtomäki, Harri Kaartinen, Sopitta Thurachen, Paula Litkey, Ville Luoma, Markus Holopainen, Gefei Kong, Hongchao Fan, Petri Rönnholm, Matti Vaaja, Antti Polvivaara, Samuli Junttila, Mikko Vastaranta, Stefano Puliti, Rasmus Astrup, Joel Kostensalo, Mari Myllymäki, Maksymilian Kulicki, Krzysztof Stereńczak, Raul de Paula Pires, Ruben Valbuena, Juan Pedro Carbonell-Rivera, Jesús Torralba, Yi-Chen Chen, Lukas Winiwarter, Markus Hollaus, Gottfried Mandlburger, Narges Takhtkeshha, Fabio Remondino, Maciej Lisiewicz, Bartłomiej Kraszewski, Xinlian Liang, Jianchang Chen, Eero Ahokas, Kirsi Karila, Eugeniu Vezeteu, Petri Manninen, Roope Näsi, Heikki Hyyti, Siiri Pyykkönen, Peilun Hu, Juha Hyyppä, Multispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: A benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithms, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Volume 233, 2026, Pages 278-309, ISSN 0924-2716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.01.031.
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/103907
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.01.031
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026031119287
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1171
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa2 = Osittain avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.01.031
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIsprs journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing
dc.relation.issn1872-8235
dc.relation.issn0924-2716
dc.relation.volume233
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.justusid137709
dc.subjecttree species
dc.subjectairborne laser scanning
dc.subjectmultispectral
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectLiDAR
dc.teh41007-00229001
dc.teh41007-00297501
dc.titleMultispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: A benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithms
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Taher_etal_2026_ISPRS_JPhotogrammRemSens.pdf
Size:
8.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Taher_etal_2026_ISPRS_JPhotogrammRemSens.pdf

Kokoelmat