Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Henkilökunnan kirjautuminen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging

Yadav, Pooja; Silvenius, Frans; Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti; Leinonen, Ilkka (2024)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Yadav_Silvenius_Katajajuuri_Leinonen_2024_JournalofCleanerProduction_Life_cycle.pdf (1.763Mt)
Lataukset 

URI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529

Yadav, Pooja
Silvenius, Frans
Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti
Leinonen, Ilkka

Julkaisusarja
Journal of cleaner production

Volyymi
448

Sivut
9 p.


Elsevier
2024
doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024100976911
Tiivistelmä
The present study focuses on the cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of a reusable takeaway food container. The system boundary includes the production, transport, use, and end of life (EoL) stages of container, considering recycling and incineration, including all the inputs (material and energy) and outputs (emissions). Scenarios (10, 30, and 100 uses of a reusable container with EoL) were proposed and compared with a single-use container. The primary data was collected from industry and secondary data was taken from the literature and the Ecoienven 3.9.1 database. The functional unit (FU) was “one use of a container”, and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used. The results showed that with a centralised collection and washing system, the global warming potential (GWP) for a single-use container (0.020 kg CO2 eq./FU) per FU had higher GWP than 10 uses (0.015 kg CO2 eq./FU), 30 uses and 100 uses (0.007 kg CO2 eq./FU) of the reusable container (EoL recycling). The GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container which results in a minimum six uses of the reusable container, providing a benefit over single-use container (EoL recycling). In EoL incineration, 10 uses scenario led to a decrease in the GWP of 46%, while 100 uses resulted in a significant reduction in the GWP of 83% compared to single-use per FU. It was found that the efficiency of the return system for empty containers significantly influenced the results. This study also quantified potential plastic waste for various scenarios.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [87110]
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus