Luke
 

Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging

dc.contributor.authorYadav, Pooja
dc.contributor.authorSilvenius, Frans
dc.contributor.authorKatajajuuri, Juha-Matti
dc.contributor.authorLeinonen, Ilkka
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6204-2911
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-8407
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T10:18:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T08:28:17Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T10:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe present study focuses on the cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of a reusable takeaway food container. The system boundary includes the production, transport, use, and end of life (EoL) stages of container, considering recycling and incineration, including all the inputs (material and energy) and outputs (emissions). Scenarios (10, 30, and 100 uses of a reusable container with EoL) were proposed and compared with a single-use container. The primary data was collected from industry and secondary data was taken from the literature and the Ecoienven 3.9.1 database. The functional unit (FU) was “one use of a container”, and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used. The results showed that with a centralised collection and washing system, the global warming potential (GWP) for a single-use container (0.020 kg CO2 eq./FU) per FU had higher GWP than 10 uses (0.015 kg CO2 eq./FU), 30 uses and 100 uses (0.007 kg CO2 eq./FU) of the reusable container (EoL recycling). The GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container which results in a minimum six uses of the reusable container, providing a benefit over single-use container (EoL recycling). In EoL incineration, 10 uses scenario led to a decrease in the GWP of 46%, while 100 uses resulted in a significant reduction in the GWP of 83% compared to single-use per FU. It was found that the efficiency of the return system for empty containers significantly influenced the results. This study also quantified potential plastic waste for various scenarios.
dc.description.vuosik2024
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange9 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid497863
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/555292
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/14170
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2024100976911
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1172
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa2 = Osittain avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.articlenumber141529
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of cleaner production
dc.relation.issn0959-6526
dc.relation.issn1879-1786
dc.relation.volume448
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/555292
dc.subjectenvironmental impact
dc.subjectlife cycle analysis
dc.subjectrecycling
dc.subjectincineration
dc.subjectsingle-use plastic food packaging
dc.subjectreusable plastic food packaging
dc.teh41007-00241601
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Yadav_Silvenius_Katajajuuri_Leinonen_2024_JournalofCleanerProduction_Life_cycle.pdf
Size:
1.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Yadav_Silvenius_Katajajuuri_Leinonen_2024_JournalofCleanerProduction_Life_cycle.pdf

Kokoelmat