Luke
 

The review of preconditions for the wider CTL and forestry bioenergy technologies use in CEE countries. Case study - the mechanized harvesting costs comparisons in Poland with harwarder options in thinning cuts. A report commissioned by EFI under the Ponsse grant Fund

dc.contributor.authorPisarek, M.-
dc.contributor.authorVäätäinen, K.-
dc.contributor.departmentMetsäntutkimuslaitos-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-25T10:19:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T00:33:46Z
dc.date.available2015-06-25T10:19:16Z
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.extent138 p.-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPisarek, M. & Väätäinen, K. 2007. The review of preconditions for the wider CTL and forestry bioenergy technologies use in CEE countries. Case study - the mechanized harvesting costs comparisons in Poland with harwarder options in thinning cuts. A report commissioned by EFI under the Ponsse grant Fund. EFI, Joensuu. 138 p.-
dc.identifier.olddbid445439
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/503901
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/48489
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.lukeperson12775-
dc.metlaperson5760-
dc.metlasuorite55376-
dc.ohjelmaMetla / Uudistuvat puutuotearvoketjut ja puunhankintaratkaisut (PUU)-
dc.publisherEFI-
dc.publisher.countryFI-
dc.publisher.placeJoensuu-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/503901
dc.subject.keywordPuola-
dc.subject.keywordbioenergia-
dc.subject.keywordharvesteri-
dc.subject.keywordkorjuukustannukset-
dc.teh3426-
dc.teh7165-
dc.titleThe review of preconditions for the wider CTL and forestry bioenergy technologies use in CEE countries. Case study - the mechanized harvesting costs comparisons in Poland with harwarder options in thinning cuts. A report commissioned by EFI under the Ponsse grant Fund-
dc.type.okmfi=D4 Julkaistu kehittämis- tai tutkimusraportti taikka -selvitys|sv=D4 Publicerad utvecklings- eller forskningsrapport eller -utredning|en=D4 Published development or research report or study|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat