Luke
 

Effect of concentrate type on rumen fermentation and milk production of cows at pasture

dc.contributor.authorKhalili, Hannele-
dc.contributor.authorSairanen, Auvo-
dc.contributor.departmentMaatalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / KEL Kotieläintuotannon tutkimus / Eläinravitsemus ERA-
dc.contributor.departmentMaatalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / ATU Alueellinen tutkimus / Pohjois-Savon tutkimusasema PSA-
dc.date.accepted2001-08-15-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T10:27:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T03:29:44Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T10:27:34Z
dc.date.created2000-06-08-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.description.abstractAbstract The experiment was conducted with 15 Autumn-calving Holstein--Friesias, three cannula, that were allowed to access a perennial timothy and meadow fescue sward between 10 June and 12 August 1996. The control treatment (C) consisted of pasture alone. For the other two treatments, cows were fed 4 kg per day of either a concentrate supplement consisting of barley (B) or a treatment (M) containing (g/kg) barley (200), oats (200), wheat bran (220), wheat (110), wheat syrup (60) and molassed sugar beet pulp (200). The experiment was carried out as a replicated (n=5) 3×3 Latin square design. The grazing area was divided into 15 paddocks and cows were grazed on a 1 to 2-day rotation. There was no treatment effect on rumen pH but the molar proportion of acetic acid in rumen fluid was higher (p<0.05) in cows grazing pasture alone (C). Ammonia N concentration was lower for M than B (p<0.01). Concentrate supplementation increased milk yield (p<0.001), the extent of which was greater for M than B (2.6 versus 1.3 kg per day; p<0.05). Protein yields increased (p<0.001) due to treatments B (51 g per day) and M (115 g per day). These results indicate that barley is a less suitable concentrate supplement than a mixture, formulated from a range of ingredients since energy corrected milk yield (ECM 20.5 versus 19.2 kg per day), protein (729 versus 665 g per day) and lactose (1000 versus 933 g per day) yields were greater (p<0.01) in treatment M than B.en
dc.description.dacok-
dc.description.stav-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange199-212-
dc.identifier.olddbid388974
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/447993
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/55056
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.publisher.placenl-
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdam-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnimal feed science and technology-
dc.relation.issn0377-8401-
dc.relation.numberinseries3-4-
dc.relation.volume84-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/447993
dc.subject.agriforslehmät-
dc.subject.agriforsmaidontuotanto-
dc.subject.agriforslaitumet-
dc.subject.agriforslaidunruokinta-
dc.subject.agriforsmärehtijät-
dc.subject.agriforsrehut-
dc.subject.agriforsruokinta-
dc.subject.agriforsväkirehut-
dc.subject.finagriKo-
dc.subject.ftebarley-
dc.subject.fteconcentrate-
dc.subject.ftemilk production-
dc.subject.ftepasture-
dc.subject.fterumen rermentation-
dc.teh10040800-
dc.teh10040801-
dc.titleEffect of concentrate type on rumen fermentation and milk production of cows at pasture-
dc.typeb-
dc.type.bib1. Asiantuntijatarkastetut tieteelliset artikkelit-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat