Luke
 

Effects of Grass Silage Additive Type and Barley Grain Preservation Method on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Community and Milk Production of Dairy Cows

dc.contributor.authorRinne, Marketta
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorTapio, Ilma
dc.contributor.authorStefański, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorBayat, Ali-Reza
dc.contributor.authorMäntysaari, Päivi
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100210310
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-0661
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-2939
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0752-9551
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-4802
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T06:48:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T07:11:50Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T06:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractGrass was ensiled using an acid-based additive (AS) or homofermentative lactic acid bacteria (IS). In addition, barley grain was either dried (DB) or crimped and ensiled (EB). The feeds were fed as total mixed rations (TMR) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement to 16 Nordic Red dairy cows in four replicated Latin squares. The differences in the fermentation quality of the two grass silages were unexpectedly small. Dry matter intake was higher (p < 0.01) for cows fed AS than those fed IS but was not affected by barley preservation method. Ruminal molar proportion of butyrate tended to be higher in cows fed AS rather than IS (p < 0.10) in expense of acetate (p < 0.05). Barley preservation method did not affect rumen fermentation but modulated rumen bacterial community composition. Milk production was not affected by silage additive but tended (p < 0.10) to be higher (39.6 vs. 39.0 kg/d) for cows fed DB rather than EB. However, barley type did not affect energy corrected milk yield due to a tendency (p < 0.10) for higher milk fat content of cows fed EB rather than DB. Milk fat yield tended (p < 0.10) to be higher for AS-fed cows than IS-fed cows, and milk protein yield was higher for cows receiving DB rather than EB. The AS resulted in more aerobically stable TMR than IS and a minor advantage was found for DB compared to EB.
dc.description.vuosik2022
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange18 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid494179
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/551627
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/12148
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022120168663
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline412
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.articlenumber266
dc.relation.doi10.3390/agriculture12020266
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAgriculture
dc.relation.issn2077-0472
dc.relation.numberinseries2
dc.relation.volume12
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/551627
dc.subjectsäilörehu
dc.subjectsäilöntä
dc.subjectsäilöntäaineet
dc.subjectmaidontuotanto (kotieläintuotanto)
dc.subjectmaitohappobakteerit
dc.subjectmaitohappokäyminen
dc.subjectmuurahaishappo
dc.subjectvilja
dc.subjectmikrobisto
dc.subjectaerobic stability
dc.subjectcrimping
dc.subjectensiled grain
dc.subjectformic acid
dc.subjectgrain preservation
dc.subjecthigh-moisture grain
dc.subjectlactic acid bacteria inoculant
dc.subjectrumen microbiome
dc.subjectsilage fermentation
dc.subject.ysosäilörehu
dc.subject.ysosäilöntä
dc.subject.ysosäilöntäaineet
dc.subject.ysomaidontuotanto (kotieläintuotanto)
dc.subject.ysomaitohappobakteerit
dc.subject.ysomaitohappokäyminen
dc.subject.ysomuurahaishappo
dc.subject.ysovilja
dc.subject.ysomikrobisto
dc.subject.ysoaerobic stability
dc.subject.ysocrimping
dc.subject.ysoensiled grain
dc.subject.ysoformic acid
dc.subject.ysograin preservation
dc.subject.ysohigh-moisture grain
dc.subject.ysolactic acid bacteria inoculant
dc.subject.ysorumen microbiome
dc.subject.ysosilage fermentation
dc.teh41007-00173301
dc.titleEffects of Grass Silage Additive Type and Barley Grain Preservation Method on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Community and Milk Production of Dairy Cows
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Rinne_M_et_al_2022.pdf
Size:
1.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Rinne_M_et_al_2022.pdf

Kokoelmat