Luke
 

Proposed EU NGT legislation in light of plant genetic variation

dc.contributor.authorSchulman, Alan H.
dc.contributor.authorHartung, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSmulders, Marinus J. M.
dc.contributor.authorSundstroem, Jens F.
dc.contributor.authorWilhelm, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorRognli, Odd Arne
dc.contributor.authorMetzlaff, Karin
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211710
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-18T12:57:11Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe European Commission (EC) proposal for New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) of July 2023 specifies that Category 1 NGT (NGT1) plants, which are considered equivalent to conventional plants, that is those obtainable by conventional plant breeding or mutagenesis, may differ from the recipient or parental plant by no more than 20 insertions, which cannot be longer than 20 bp; deletions can be no more than 20 but of any size. Here, we examine the proposed 20/20 NGT1 limit against the background of the theoretical considerations and older data used to frame it and in light of recent data from highly contiguous long-read assemblies for reference genomes and pangenomes. We find that current genomic data indicate that natural variation in germplasm used by breeders is much greater than earlier understood and that both conventional breeding and mutagenesis can introduce genomic changes that are both more extensive in size and more frequent than the NGT Category 1 ‘20 insertions of maximum 20 bp’ limit would allow. Furthermore, natural variation also scales with genome size and complexity, a factor not considered in the EC proposal. We conclude that the proposed cut-offs under which an NGT plant is considered equivalent to conventional plants do not align with what is observed in nature, conventional breeding and mutagenesis. Updating the 20/20 rule to broader limits would facilitate breeding for climate resilience, farming sustainability and nutritional security, while ensuring that NGT1 plants are equivalent to conventional ones.
dc.format.pagerange4261-4270
dc.identifier.citationHow to cite: Schulman, A.H., Hartung, F., Smulders, M.J.M., Sundström, J.F., Wilhelm, R., Rognli, O.A. and Metzlaff, K. (2025), Proposed EU NGT legislation in light of plant genetic variation. Plant Biotechnol. J, 23: 4261-4270. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70228
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/103474
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70228
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe20251218121860
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1182
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa1 = Kokonaan avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.doi10.1111/pbi.70228
dc.relation.ispartofPlant biotechnology journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPlant biotechnology journal
dc.relation.issn1467-7644
dc.relation.issn1467-7652
dc.relation.volume23
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.source.justusid131720
dc.subjectgene editing
dc.subjectnewgenomic techniques (NGT)
dc.subjectnewbreeding techniques (NBT)
dc.subjectplantgenetic diversity
dc.subjectmutagenesis
dc.subjectCRISPR/Cas9
dc.titleProposed EU NGT legislation in light of plant genetic variation
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A2 Översiktsartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Plant_Biotechnology_Journal-2025-Schulman-Proposed_EU_NGT_legislation.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Plant_Biotechnology_Journal-2025-Schulman-Proposed_EU_NGT_legislation.pdf

Kokoelmat