Luke
 

Use, calibration and verification of agroecological models for boreal environments: A review

dc.contributor.authorForster, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHelama, Samuli
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Matthew T.
dc.contributor.authorRotz, Clarence Alan
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jinfeng
dc.contributor.authorCiais, Phillippe
dc.contributor.authorPattey, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorVirkajärvi, Perttu
dc.contributor.authorShurpali, Narasinha
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211410
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211410
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211410
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-7777
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-4396
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9777-3354
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T07:28:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-30T08:05:37Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T07:28:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPast assessments report negative impacts of the climate crisis in boreal areas; but milder and shorter winters and elevated atmospheric CO2 may provide opportunities for agricultural productivity potentially playing a significant role in future food security. Arable cropping systems are expanding in boreal areas, but the regional mainstay will likely continue to be livestock production. Agroecological models can when appropriately calibrated and evaluated, facilitate improved productivity while minimising environmental impacts by identifying system interactions, and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon stocks and fertiliser use. While models designed for temperate and tropical zones abound, few are developed specifically for boreal zones, and there is uncertainty around the performance of existing models in boreal areas. We reviewed model performance across boreal environments and management systems. We identified a dearth of modelling studies in boreal regions, with the publication of three or less papers per year since the year 2000, constituting a significant research gap. Models IFSM and BASGRA_N performed best in grassland production, DNDC best in predicting soil N2O and NH3 emissions. No model outperformed all others, strengthening the case for ensemble modelling. Existing agroecological models would be worthy of further evaluation, providing model improvements designed for boreal systems.
dc.description.vuosik2022
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange14-30
dc.identifier.olddbid494379
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/551823
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/84745
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022121370986
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline415
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.doi10.1002/glr2.12010
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGrassland Research
dc.relation.issn2097-051X
dc.relation.issn2770-1743
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume1
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/551823
dc.subjectboreal region
dc.subjectcarbon-nitrogen cycling
dc.subjectecophysiological modelling
dc.subjectgreenhouse gas emissions
dc.subjectsoil carbon
dc.teh41007-00209501
dc.teh41007-00195201
dc.titleUse, calibration and verification of agroecological models for boreal environments: A review
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A2 Översiktsartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Forster_D_et_al_2022.pdf
Size:
2.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Forster_D_et_al_2022.pdf

Kokoelmat