Luke
 

Canal blocking optimization in restoration of drained peatlands

dc.contributor.authorUrzainki, Iñaki
dc.contributor.authorLaurén, Ari
dc.contributor.authorPalviainen, Marjo
dc.contributor.authorHaahti, Kersti
dc.contributor.authorBudiman, Arif
dc.contributor.authorBasuki, Imam
dc.contributor.authorNetzer, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHökkä, Hannu
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110410
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T13:10:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T18:14:07Z
dc.date.available2020-10-12T13:10:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractDrained peatlands are one of the main sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions globally. Emission reduction and, more generally, ecosystem restoration can be enhanced by raising the water table using canal or drain blocks. When restoring large areas, the number of blocks becomes limited by the available resources, which raises the following question: in which exact positions should a given number of blocks be placed in order to maximize the water table rise throughout the area? There is neither a simple nor an analytic answer. The water table response is a complex phenomenon that depends on several factors, such as the topology of the canal network, site topography, peat hydraulic properties, vegetation characteristics and meteorological conditions. We developed a new method to position the canal blocks based on the combination of a hydrological model and heuristic optimization algorithms. We simulated 3 d dry downs from a water saturated initial state for different block positions using the Boussinesq equation, and the block configurations maximizing water table rise were searched for by means of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. We applied this approach to a large drained peatland area (931 km2) in Sumatra, Indonesia. Our solution consistently outperformed traditional block locating methods, indicating that drained peatland restoration can be made more effective at the same cost by selecting the positions of the blocks using the presented scheme.
dc.description.vuosik2020
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange4769-4784
dc.identifier.olddbid488903
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/546364
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/5593
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202101131720
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherCopernicus Publ.
dc.relation.doi10.5194/bg-17-4769-2020
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiogeosciences
dc.relation.issn1726-4170
dc.relation.issn1726-4189
dc.relation.numberinseries19
dc.relation.volume17
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/546364
dc.teh41007-00140500
dc.titleCanal blocking optimization in restoration of drained peatlands
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Urzainki_et_al_2020.pdf
Size:
3.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Urzainki_et_al_2020.pdf

Kokoelmat