Luke
 

Spatial Memory Drives Foraging Strategies of Wolves, but in Highly Individual Ways

dc.contributor.authorGurarie, Eliezer
dc.contributor.authorBracis, Chloe
dc.contributor.authorBrilliantova, Angelina
dc.contributor.authorKojola, Ilpo
dc.contributor.authorSuutarinen, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, Otso
dc.contributor.authorPotluri, Sriya
dc.contributor.authorFagan, William F.
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110810
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T11:15:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T18:37:55Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T11:15:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe ability of wild animals to navigate and survive in complex and dynamic environments depends on their ability to store relevant information and place it in a spatial context. Despite the centrality of spatial memory, and given our increasing ability to observe animal movements in the wild, it is perhaps surprising how difficult it is to demonstrate spatial memory empirically. We present a cognitive analysis of movements of several wolves (Canis lupus) in Finland during a summer period of intensive hunting and den-centered pup-rearing. We tracked several wolves in the field by visiting nearly all GPS locations outside the den, allowing us to identify the species, location and timing of nearly all prey killed. We then developed a model that assigns a spatially explicit value based on memory of predation success and territorial marking. The framework allows for estimation of multiple cognitive parameters, including temporal and spatial scales of memory. For most wolves, fitted memory-based models outperformed null models by 20 to 50% at predicting locations where wolves chose to forage. However, there was a high amount of individual variability among wolves in strength and even direction of responses to experiences. Some wolves tended to return to locations with recent predation success—following a strategy of foraging site fidelity—while others appeared to prefer a site switching strategy. These differences are possibly explained by variability in pack sizes, numbers of pups, and features of the territories. Our analysis points toward concrete strategies for incorporating spatial memory in the study of animal movements while providing nuanced insights into the behavioral strategies of individual predators.
dc.description.vuosik2022
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.identifier.olddbid494240
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/551688
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/6244
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022031423382
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline415
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fevo.2022.768478
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution
dc.relation.issn2296-701X
dc.relation.volume10
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/551688
dc.subjectdiscrete choice modeling
dc.subjectwolf
dc.subjectmovement
dc.subjectpredation
dc.subjectboundary patrolling
dc.subjectcentral place foraging
dc.subjectforaging site fidelity
dc.subjectforaging site switching
dc.teh41001-00001401
dc.titleSpatial Memory Drives Foraging Strategies of Wolves, but in Highly Individual Ways
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Gurarie_et_al_2022.pdf
Size:
2.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Gurarie_et_al_2022.pdf

Kokoelmat