Luke
 

Is the organic carbon-to-clay ratio a reliable indicator of soil health?

dc.contributor.authorMäkipää, Raisa
dc.contributor.authorMenichetti, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-García, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorTörmänen, Tiina
dc.contributor.authorLehtonen, Aleksi
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100311110
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3146-4425
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-9671
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-6762
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-0388
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-30T11:05:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T08:39:33Z
dc.date.available2024-10-30T11:05:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractClimate action plans under the Paris Climate Agreement and other national commitments aimed at improving soil-based ecosystem services require the operational monitoring of soil carbon (C). The European Union is aiming to enhance soil health, and as part of the proposed Soil Monitoring Law, the European Commission recommends the monitoring of the soil C loss indicator among other soil health indicators. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of the proposed soil C loss indicator by assessing its performance using the EU-wide 2009 LUCAS soil survey data. The proposed indicator is the soil organic carbon (SOC) to clay ratio, with a threshold value of 1:13. The results are also compared with the C stock changes reported by countries to the climate convention (UNFCCC). Our results reveal that the variation in SOC and clay content at European scale exceeds that of the data used to develop the proposed indicator. We also found that the variation in the SOC content was influenced not only by clay content but also by climate and land-use reflecting C input levels. Therefore, the defined threshold is inadequate for detecting degraded soils if the SOC and clay content are beyond the conditions used to establish the criteria. Furthermore, major discrepancies were observed between the soil carbon stock changes reported by the national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and the proportions of degraded soils identified by using the soil C loss indicator. We conclude that employing a single indicator such as SOC:Clay ratio with one threshold value for all soils across various land covers, management practices, and climatic conditions, as defined by the European Commission for the Soil Monitoring Law, is inappropriate for monitoring soil C loss.
dc.description.vuosik2024
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange8 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid497937
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/555365
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/14485
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116862
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2024103087976
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa1 = Kokonaan avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.articlenumber116862
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116862
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGeoderma
dc.relation.issn0016-7061
dc.relation.issn1872-6259
dc.relation.volume444
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/555365
dc.subjectsoil organic carbon
dc.subjectsoc:clay ratio
dc.subjectEuropean mineral soils
dc.subjectLUCAS soil survey
dc.subjectforest soil
dc.subjectagricultural soil
dc.subjectsoil monitoring
dc.teh41007-00256601
dc.teh41007-00213300
dc.teh41007-00261503
dc.titleIs the organic carbon-to-clay ratio a reliable indicator of soil health?
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Makipaa_etal_2024_Geoderma_Is_the_organic_carbon-to-clay.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makipaa_etal_2024_Geoderma_Is_the_organic_carbon-to-clay.pdf

Kokoelmat