Luke
 

Efficacy of Biological and Chemical Control Agents against Heterobasidion Spore Infections of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Stumps on Drained Peatland

dc.contributor.authorPiri, Tuula
dc.contributor.authorSaarinen, Markku
dc.contributor.authorHamberg, Leena
dc.contributor.authorHantula, Jarkko
dc.contributor.authorGaitnieks, Talis
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-3726
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-7768
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-0636
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T06:53:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T20:26:18Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T06:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractTreatment of conifer stumps with a control agent effectively prevents Heterobasidion spore infections in summer cuttings and protects the residual stand and the next tree generation from damage caused by Heterobasidion root rot. Thus far, stump treatment experiments have been carried out in mineral soils, and no information is available on the efficacy of stump treatment agents in boreal peatland conditions. In the present study, biological and chemical control agents (Phlebiopsis gigantea and urea, respectively) were tested in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands subjected to thinning, cap cutting, and clearcutting on drained peatland in Central Finland. The control efficacy of urea was high in both spruce and pine stumps (on average 99.5 and 85.3%, respectively), while the efficacy of P. gigantea was highly variable on both tree species and ranged from full protection down to negative control effect, i.e., there were more Heterobasidion infections on the treated than untreated half of the stumps. The moisture content of the stump wood or the thickness of the peat layer did not affect the control efficacy of either control agent. These results emphasize a need for further studies to determine the reasons for the unsteadiness of the biological control in peatland conditions.
dc.description.vuosik2023
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange17 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid495854
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/553293
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/10065
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023032032375
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.articlenumber346
dc.relation.doi10.3390/jof9030346
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Fungi
dc.relation.issn2309-608X
dc.relation.numberinseries3
dc.relation.volume9
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/553293
dc.subjectHeterobasidionroot rot
dc.subjectspore infection
dc.subjectstump treatment
dc.subjecturea
dc.subjectPhlebiopsis gigantea
dc.subjectpeatland
dc.teh41007-00220101
dc.titleEfficacy of Biological and Chemical Control Agents against Heterobasidion Spore Infections of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Stumps on Drained Peatland
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Piri_et_al_2023.pdf
Size:
598.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Piri_et_al_2023.pdf

Kokoelmat