Luke
 

Field performance of sand-coated (Conniflex®) Norway spruce seedlings planted in mounds made by continuously advancing mounder and in undisturbed soil

dc.contributor.authorLuoranen, Jaana
dc.contributor.authorLaine, Tiina
dc.contributor.authorSaksa, Timo
dc.contributor.departmentid4100210410
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-2030
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1776-2357
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T09:43:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T18:48:08Z
dc.date.available2022-05-09T09:43:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) is among the worst pests of newly planted conifer seedlings in Europe. EU regulations restrict the use of insecticides, the cost of mechanical site preparation (MSP) is high, and it has even been suggested that MSP should be abandoned due to social and environmental causes. The aim of this study was to investigate i) the field performance of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings planted in mounds made by a continuously advancing mounder (CAM) and in undisturbed soil in southern Finland, and ii) how well the physical barrier (Conniflex® sand coating) prevented pine weevil damage compared to insecticide-applied and unprotected seedlings. The quality of CAM was generally at an acceptable level. After two growing seasons, mortality, mainly caused by pine weevils, was higher and growth lower in unprotected seedlings than in Conniflex-coated or insecticide-treated seedlings. Mortality was also higher and growth lower in undisturbed soil than in mounds. Even though the quality of soil preparation after CAM was quite good, planting Norway spruce seedlings without any protection could not guarantee a successful planting result (>1500 seedlings ha−1). Conniflex coating and insecticide treatment provided equal protection against serious pine weevil damage.
dc.description.vuosik2022
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange10 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid494401
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/551844
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/6553
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120259
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022050933614
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.articlenumber120259
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120259
dc.relation.ispartofseriesForest Ecology and Management
dc.relation.issn0378-1127
dc.relation.volume517
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/551844
dc.subjecttukkimiehentäi
dc.subjectmetsäkuusi
dc.subjectmaanmuokkaus
dc.subjectmuokkaamattomuus
dc.subjectPicea abies
dc.subjectPine weevil
dc.subjectHylobius abietis
dc.subjectSite preparation
dc.subjectPhysical protection
dc.teh41007-00167501
dc.titleField performance of sand-coated (Conniflex®) Norway spruce seedlings planted in mounds made by continuously advancing mounder and in undisturbed soil
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Luoranen_et_al_2022.pdf
Size:
4.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Luoranen_et_al_2022.pdf

Kokoelmat