Luke
 

Butterfly species’ responses to urbanization: differing effects of human population density and built-up area

dc.contributor.authorKuussaari, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorToivonen, Marjaana
dc.contributor.authorHeliölä, Janne
dc.contributor.authorPöyry, Juha
dc.contributor.authorMellado, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorEkroos, Johan
dc.contributor.authorHyyryläinen, Vesa
dc.contributor.authorVähä-Piikkiö, Inkeri
dc.contributor.authorTiainen, Juha
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110810
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-2594
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T06:29:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T13:52:56Z
dc.date.available2020-12-15T06:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractGood knowledge on how increasing urbanization affects biodiversity is essential in order to preserve biodiversity in urban green spaces. We examined how urban development affects species richness and total abundance of butterflies as well as the occurrence and abundance of individual species within the Helsinki metropolitan area in Northern Europe. Repeated butterfly counts in 167 separate 1-km-long transects within Helsinki covered the entire urbanization gradient, quantified by human population density and the proportion of built-up area (within a 50-m buffer surrounding each butterfly transect). We found consistently negative effects of both human population density and built-up area on all studied butterfly variables, though butterflies responded markedly more negatively to increasing human population density than to built-up area. Responses in butterfly species richness and total abundance showed higher variability in relation to proportion of built-up area than to human density, especially in areas of high human density. Increasing human density negatively affected both the abundance and the occurrence of 47% of the 19 most abundant species, whereas, for the proportion of built-up area, the corresponding percentages were 32% and 32%, respectively. Species with high habitat specificity and low mobility showed higher sensitivity to urbanization (especially high human population density) than habitat generalists and mobile species that dominated the urban butterfly communities. Our results suggest that human population density provides a better indicator of urbanization effects on butterflies compared to the proportion of built-up area. The generality of this finding should be verified in other contexts and taxonomic groups.
dc.description.vuosik2020
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange515–527
dc.identifier.olddbid489227
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/546687
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/24365
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe20201215100688
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1181
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherChapman & Hall
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11252-020-01055-6
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUrban ecosystems
dc.relation.issn1083-8155
dc.relation.issn1573-1642
dc.relation.volume24
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/546687
dc.subject.ysobiotic homogenization
dc.subject.ysobutterfly species responses
dc.subject.ysohuman population density
dc.subject.ysoproportion of built-up area
dc.subject.ysospecies traits
dc.subject.ysourbanization gradient
dc.teh41007-00129200
dc.titleButterfly species’ responses to urbanization: differing effects of human population density and built-up area
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kuussaari et al 2021.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Kokoelmat