Evaluation of Finnish roseroot (Rhodiola rosea) gene collection from different geographical origins
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Luke
2016
Tätä artikkelia/julkaisua ei ole tallennettu Jukuriin. Julkaisun tiedoissa voi kuitenkin olla linkki toisaalle tallennettuun artikkeliin/julkaisuun.
All rights reserved
Pysyvä osoite
URI
Tiivistelmä
During the domestication experiments of Rhodiola rosea, a collection of roseroot strains from differ-ent geographical origins was created at Mikkeli, South-East Finland (61° 44‘ N, 27° 18‘ E ). The aims of this study was to compare the root biomass and salidroside and total rosavin contents of eleven Finnish, eight Scandinavian, five Central European and two Russian (Altai) accessions and to choose the best accessions for further propagation. The analyses were carried out in the laboratory of Expert Bio, St. Petersburg, Russia. The fresh weight of Rhodiola rosea roots ranged between 0.32 and 2.74 kg/plant. The Central European accessions developed the biggest roots, with an average of 1.93 kg/root (1.30–2.74 kg), followed by the Scandinavian accessions with the mean of 1.17 kg/plant (0.78–1.66 kg) and the Finnish accessions with the mean of 0.79 kg/plant (0.32–1.30). Altai accession was similar (x=0.76 kg/plant). The average salidroside content of the Scandinavian and Altai accessions were below 1.0 %, while the Finnish and Central European accessions contained 1.3–1.4% of salidroside. No statistical differences between the geographical groups were found. The Scandinavian and Central European accessions contained 1.0–1.15 % of total rosavins on average. The Finnish accessions contained higher quantities, 1.5 %, of total rosavins. Significantly higher contents were measured in the Altai accession, 2.4 % (P<0.001). Six accessions containing high salidroside and total rosavin contents were chosen for saving in the official Finnish medicinal plant gene collection.
ISBN
978-952-326-337-6
OKM-julkaisutyyppi
D2 Artikkeli ammatillisessa kokoomateoksessa (ml. toimittajan kirjoittama johdantoartikkeli)
Julkaisusarja
Natural resources and bioeconomy studies
Volyymi
Numero
72/2016
Sivut
Sivut
s. 23-33
ISSN
2342-7647