Luke
 

Developing hybrid SWOT methodologies for choosing joint bioeconomy co-operation priorities by three Finnish universities

dc.contributor.authorKangas, Jyrki
dc.contributor.authorTikkanen, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorLeskinen, Pekka
dc.contributor.authorKurttila, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorKajanus, Miika
dc.contributor.departmentLuke / Uudet liiketoimintamahdollisuudet / Kiertotalouden ratkaisut / Ryhmän yht. Kiertotalouden ratkaisut (4100300498)-
dc.contributor.departmentid4100300498-
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Eastern Finland, Department of Forest Sciences-
dc.contributor.otherFinnish Environment Institute-
dc.contributor.otherSavonia University of Applied Sciences-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-17T10:56:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T10:34:13Z
dc.date.available2017-08-17T10:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study were two-fold: to provide decision aid for a practical bioeconomy research, development and innovation (RDI) and education challenge, and to elaborate hybrid strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) methodologies for providing tangible suggestions as to strategic choices to alleviate the challenge. Scientifically, the new methodology developed is the main result of the study, as it can be used for other strategy processes as well, while the case-wise strategic choices may not be generalized. A hybrid method was developed based on the combined use of SWOT that was enlarged by goals and actions, social choice theory and robust portfolio modelling (RPM). The method was applied to deriving joint strategic choices for developing forest bioeconomy education and RDI together by three universities in eastern Finland. A joint brainstorming process was organized in order to choose together the means to develop the co-operation efficiently and in a manner acceptable for all the universities. Voting methods and the core value calculation of RPM were used for prioritizing elements in normal SWOT, goals and actions. The most prioritized elements formed the basis for the co-operation development portfolio. The method development suggestions include, for example, a recommendation to prefer approval voting over cumulative voting in the workshop setting.-
dc.description.vuosik2017-
dc.formatSekä painettu, että verkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange459-471-
dc.identifier.elss1759-7277-
dc.identifier.olddbid482544
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/540403
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/69293
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1271625-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei-
dc.okm.discipline119 Muut luonnontieteet-
dc.okm.discipline415 Muut maataloustieteet-
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei-
dc.okm.openaccess0 = Ei vastausta-
dc.okm.selfarchivedei-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.publisher.countrygb-
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1080/17597269.2016.1271625-
dc.relation.ispartofBiofuels in the future bioeconomy-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiofuels-
dc.relation.issn1759-7269-
dc.relation.numberinseries4-
dc.relation.volume8-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540403
dc.subject.keywordSWOT-
dc.subject.keywordbioeconomy-
dc.subject.keywordrobust portfolio modelling-
dc.subject.keywordstrategy process-
dc.subject.keywordvoting-
dc.titleDeveloping hybrid SWOT methodologies for choosing joint bioeconomy co-operation priorities by three Finnish universities-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat