Luke
 

The effects of grass biomass preservation methods, organic acid treatment and press type on the separation efficiency in the green biorefinery

dc.contributor.authorAyanfe, Nisola
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorStefański, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorPap, Nora
dc.contributor.authorRinne, Marketta
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211110
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211510
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-3665
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-2939
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-9941
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-7410
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-0661
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T06:35:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T14:29:41Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T06:35:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractProcessing green biomass into novel products provides opportunities to improve the sustainability of the bioeconomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of biomass types (fresh, frozen-and-thawed, dried-and-rehydrated and ensiled grass) as well as formic and propionic acid-based additive on the efficiency of liquid-solid separation and crude protein (CP) yield. Three different pressing methods for liquid-solid separation were used. All preservation methods improved biorefinery efficiency compared to fresh grass, and the effect of additive was more profound on the fresh biomass than other materials. However, due to lower CP concentration in the liquid, presumably caused by lower nitrogen solubility, the amount of CP retained in the liquid was not improved in response to the additive treatment. The type of processing technology plays a key role in the extraction of relevant compounds from biomass. With less efficient separation methods, the effects of pretreatments were more pronounced.
dc.description.vuosik2023
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange7 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid495738
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/553179
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/25081
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023022027829
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline414
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.articlenumber101356
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101356
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBioresource Technology Reports
dc.relation.issn2589-014X
dc.relation.volume21
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/553179
dc.subjectpretreatment
dc.subjectpress juice
dc.subjectbiomass conversion
dc.subjectextraction
dc.subjectfractionation
dc.subjectscrew press
dc.subjectadditives
dc.teh41007-00214900
dc.titleThe effects of grass biomass preservation methods, organic acid treatment and press type on the separation efficiency in the green biorefinery
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Ayanfe_et_al_2023.pdf
Size:
541.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Ayanfe_et_al_2023.pdf

Kokoelmat