Agricultural Decision Support Tools in Europe : What kind of tools are needed to foster soil health?

Abstract

Decision support tools (DSTs) are crucial in aiding agricultural decision-making, particularly in improving soil health by enhancing nutrient management, soil organic matter (SOM) and water retention. Despite the availability of numerous DSTs in Europe, their adoption, effectiveness and development needs are not well understood, as most research is based on literature reviews rather than direct feedback from stakeholders. This study aims at filling this gap by conducting an expert survey of the most widely used digital DSTs across Europe on SOM, water retention and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. We aimed at evaluating the current use, limitations and development needs of DSTs and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness and adoption of DSTs in the context of soil health. A questionnaire was distributed to experts in 24 countries. Answers were received from 18 countries, including 14 European Union (EU) nations, Norway, the UK, Switzerland and Turkey. A total of 115 DSTs were identified aligning with our definition of DST, with agronomists, consultants and farmers being the primary users. Adoption of DSTs was rated moderate (score: 3.1/5), with tools featuring user-friendly interfaces and alignment with farmer goals achieving higher adoption rates. DSTs were rated better suited to achieve farm-level goals (score: 4.1/5) than regional (score: 3.6/5) or national objectives (score: 3.5/5). Major barriers to adoption included limited end-user involvement in DST development, which may hinder alignment with practical needs. Considering all the received questionnaires, the most frequently cited areas for improvement were nutrient use efficiency (45%), SOM (24%) and water retention (18%). Respondents emphasised the need for better integration of new farming systems (e.g., organic farming, agroforestry), more detailed process descriptions, integration of multiple processes, inclusion of economic modules and improved user interfaces. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of DSTs in Europe, revealing a diverse yet moderately adopted landscape. Increasing user engagement, enhancing technical integration and improving accessibility are essential for promoting a wider use of DSTs to improve soil health. By adopting these recommendations, DSTs can play a key role in achieving the EU's sustainability goals, fostering resilient agricultural systems and addressing environmental challenges such as soil degradation and climate change.