Luke
 

How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might)

dc.contributor.authorKuosmanen, Timo-
dc.contributor.authorKuosmanen, Natalia-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat MTP / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat (MPO)-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat MTP / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat (MPO)-
dc.date.accepted2010-01-04-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T11:07:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T07:45:39Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T11:07:51Z
dc.date.created2009-12-30-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.description.abstractSustainability is a complex multidimensional concept that entails economic, environmental, and social aspects. The sustainable value (SV) method developed by F. Figge and T. Hahn [Ecol. Econ. 48(2004) 173-187] is one of the most promising attempts to measure sustainability performance of firms. SV measures corporate contributions to sustainability by valuing resource use based on the opportunity cost, which must be estimated. This paper critically examines Figge and Hahn's estimator for opportunity cost, and shows that the proposed estimator rests on a number of strong, unrealistic assumptions. Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations conducted by authors shows that the proposed estimator performs very poorly even under ideal conditions. Having identified shortcomings in the SV method, we review some econometric approaches with a proven statistical foundation, which might be usefully applied in the present context.en
dc.description.dacok-
dc.description.stav-
dc.description.vuosik2009-
dc.formatSekä painettu että verkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange235-243-
dc.identifier.olddbid417090
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/476108
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/63479
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.publisher.placenl-
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdam-
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.008-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcological economics-
dc.relation.issn0921-8009-
dc.relation.numberinseries2-
dc.relation.volume69-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/476108
dc.subject.agriforsvaihtoehtoiskustannus-
dc.subject.agriforstuottavuus-
dc.subject.agriforskestävä kehitys-
dc.subject.agrovocopportunity costs-
dc.subject.agrovocsustainability-
dc.subject.finagriMa-
dc.subject.fteeco-efficiency-
dc.subject.fteenvironmental performance-
dc.subject.fteproductive efficiency analysis-
dc.subject.keywordekotehokkuus-
dc.subject.keywordympäristötehokkuus-
dc.subject.keywordtehokkuusanalyysi-
dc.teh21010003-
dc.titleHow not to measure sustainable value (and how one might)-
dc.typeb-
dc.type.bib1. Asiantuntijatarkastetut tieteelliset artikkelit-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat