Luke
 

A Review of Phosphorus Removal Structures: How to Assess and Compare Their Performance

dc.contributor.authorPenn, Chad
dc.contributor.authorChagas, Isis
dc.contributor.authorKlimeski, Aleksandar
dc.contributor.authorLyngsie, Gry
dc.contributor.departmentLuke / Luonnonvarat ja biotuotanto / Ympäristövaikutukset / Vesitalous ja vesistökuormitus (4100100412)-
dc.contributor.departmentid4100100412-
dc.contributor.otherUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-
dc.contributor.otherPurdue University. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering-
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Copenhagen. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-10T14:24:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T20:53:26Z
dc.date.available2017-11-10T14:24:35Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractControlling dissolved phosphorus (P) losses to surface waters is challenging as most conservation practices are only effective at preventing particulate P losses. As a result, P removal structures were developed to filter dissolved P from drainage water before reaching a water body. While many P removal structures with different P sorption materials (PSMs) have been constructed over the past two decades, there remains a need to evaluate their performances and compare on a normalized basis. The purpose of this review was to compile performance data of pilot and field-scale P removal structures and present techniques for normalization and comparison. Over 40 studies were normalized by expressing cumulative P removal as a function of cumulative P loading to the contained PSM. Results were further analyzed as a function of retention time (RT), inflow P concentration, and type of PSM. Structures treating wastewater were generally more efficient than non-point drainage water due to higher RT and inflow P concentrations. For Ca-rich PSMs, including slag, increased RT allowed for greater P removal. Among structures with low RT and inflow P concentrations common to non-point drainage, Fe-based materials had an overall higher cumulative removal efficiency compared to non-slag and slag materials.-
dc.description.vuosik2017-]
dc.formatVerkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.identifier.olddbid482999
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/540842
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/37304
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei-
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiede-
dc.okm.discipline219 Ympäristön bioteknologia-
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon-
dc.okm.openaccess1 = Open access -julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu-
dc.okm.selfarchivedei-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.doidoi:10.3390/w9080583-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWater-
dc.relation.issn2073-4441-
dc.relation.numberinseries8-
dc.relation.volume9-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540842
dc.subject.agriforsfosfori-
dc.subject.agriforsvedenlaatu-
dc.subject.agriforshulevesi-
dc.subject.agrovocphosphorus-
dc.subject.agrovocwater quality-
dc.subject.agrovocstorm water-
dc.subject.agrovocwater management-
dc.subject.keywordphosphorus removal-
dc.subject.keywordphosphorus sorption materials-
dc.subject.keywordbest management practices-
dc.subject.keywordlegacy phosphorus-
dc.subject.keywordurban stormwater-
dc.titleA Review of Phosphorus Removal Structures: How to Assess and Compare Their Performance-
dc.type.okmfi=A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A2 Översiktsartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat