Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration: Rereading Stephen Jay Gould
Routledge
2024
Helama_2024_TheolSci_Nonoverlapping_Magisteria_Versus.pdf - Publisher's version - 1.33 MB
How to cite: Helama, S. (2024). Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration: Rereading Stephen Jay Gould. Theology and Science, 22(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2351648
Pysyvä osoite
Tiivistelmä
The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. However, it is commonly neglected that NOMA also permits dialogue and even integration of scientific and religious inputs at the personal level, i.e. beyond the level of magisteria. To distinguish the two levels, it is essential to note that Gould considered the magisteria not as any kind of domain but closely related to teaching authorities.
ISBN
OKM-julkaisutyyppi
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Julkaisusarja
Theology and science
Volyymi
22
Numero
2
Sivut
Sivut
393-406
ISSN
1474-6700
1474-6719
1474-6719