Luke
 

Identifying Environmental and Natural Resource Management Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Greg
dc.contributor.authorKangas, Katja
dc.contributor.authorJuutinen, Artti
dc.contributor.authorTolvanen, Anne
dc.contributor.departmentLuke / Talous- ja yhteiskunta / Ympäristö- ja yritystalous / Ympäristö- ja yritystalous (4100400211)-
dc.contributor.departmentLuke / Talous- ja yhteiskunta / Luonnonvarat ja maaseudun kehittäminen / Luonnonvarat ja maaseudun kehittäminen (4100400411)-
dc.contributor.departmentLuke / Talous- ja yhteiskunta / Luonnonvarat ja maaseudun kehittäminen / Ryhmän yht. Luonnonvarat ja maaseudun kehittäminen (4100400498)-
dc.contributor.departmentid4100400211-
dc.contributor.departmentid4100400411-
dc.contributor.departmentid4100400498-
dc.contributor.otherNatural Resources Management & Environmental Sciences, California Polytechnic State University-
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-28T13:04:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T16:39:06Z
dc.date.available2017-11-28T13:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractMethods have been proposed for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping data and models. In a case study from Finland, we extend conflict mapping research by evaluating the capacity for participatory mapping to identify conflict for land uses that include mining, tourism development, commercial forestry, recreation, and nature protection. We evaluated two conflict models using reference sites where conflict was expected and assessed whether conflict potential was influenced by participant social group (resident, visitor, holiday home owner). The conflict models correctly identified the locations of current and proposed mining projects and major tourism locations (ski areas) in the region, while conflict for commercial forestry and reindeer herding was spatially distributed. Preferences for land use by social group were more similar than different across the study region. Identification of conflict potential using participatory mapping can provide a useful planning diagnostic but would benefit from additional research for validation.-
dc.description.vuosik2017-
dc.formatSekä painettu, että verkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange1458-1475-
dc.identifier.elss1521-0723-
dc.identifier.olddbid483122
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/540944
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/793
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei-
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiede-
dc.okm.discipline213 Sähkö-, automaatio- ja tietoliikennetekniikka, elektroniikka-
dc.okm.discipline4111 Maataloustiede-
dc.okm.discipline4112 Metsätiede-
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon-
dc.okm.openaccess0 = Ei vastausta-
dc.okm.selfarchivedei-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1347977-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSociety & Natural Resources-
dc.relation.issn0894-1920-
dc.relation.numberinseries12-
dc.relation.volume30-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540944
dc.subject.agrovocconflicts-
dc.subject.agrovocanalysis-
dc.subject.agrovocland use-
dc.subject.agrovocparticipation-
dc.subject.keywordconflict analysis-
dc.subject.keywordPPGIS-
dc.subject.keywordpublic participation-
dc.teh41007-00035200-
dc.titleIdentifying Environmental and Natural Resource Management Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat