Luke
 

Forest multifunctionality is not resilient to intensive forestry

dc.contributor.authorPohjanmies, Tähti
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorTriviño, María
dc.contributor.authorBengtsson, Jan
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310610
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-4683
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-1594
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T09:37:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T18:21:22Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T09:37:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThere is ample evidence that intensive management of ecosystems causes declines in biodiversity as well as in multiple ecosystem services, i.e., in multifunctionality. However, less is known about the permanence and reversibility of these responses. To gain insight into whether multifunctionality can be sustained under intensive management, we developed a framework building on the concept of resilience: a system’s ability to avoid displacement and to return or transform to a desired state. We applied it to test the ability of forest multifunctionality to persist during and recover from intensive management for timber production in a boreal forest. Using forest growth simulations and multiobjective optimization, we created alternative future paths where the forest was managed for maximal timber production, for forest multifunctionality, or first maximal timber production and then multifunctionality. We show that forest multifunctionality is substantially diminished under intensive forestry and recovers the slower, the longer intensive forestry has been continued. Intensive forestry thus not only reduces forest multifunctionality but hinders its recovery should management goals change, i.e., weakens its resilience. The results suggest a need to adjust ecosystem management according to long-term sustainability goals already today.
dc.description.vuosik2021
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.identifier.olddbid489487
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/546947
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/5762
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202101131718
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1172
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10342-020-01348-7
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean journal of forest research
dc.relation.issn1612-4669
dc.relation.issn1612-4677
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/546947
dc.subject.ysoSustainable forest management
dc.subject.ysoecosystem services
dc.subject.ysoBiodiversity
dc.subject.ysoBoreal forest
dc.subject.ysoFinland
dc.subject.ysoTransformation capacity
dc.tehOHFO-Alku-4
dc.titleForest multifunctionality is not resilient to intensive forestry
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Pohjanmies_et_al_2021.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Pohjanmies_et_al_2021.pdf

Kokoelmat