Luke
 

Forest damage

dc.contributor.authorHantula, Jarkko
dc.contributor.authorElfstrand, Malin
dc.contributor.authorHekkala, Anne-Maarit
dc.contributor.authorHietala, Ari M.
dc.contributor.authorHonkaniemi, Juha
dc.contributor.authorKlapwijk, Maartje
dc.contributor.authorKoivula, Matti
dc.contributor.authorMatala, Juho
dc.contributor.authorRönnberg, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorSiitonen, Juha
dc.contributor.authorWidemo, Fredrik
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110710
dc.contributor.editorRautio, Pasi
dc.contributor.editorRouta, Johanna
dc.contributor.editorHuuskonen, Saija
dc.contributor.editorHolmström, Emma
dc.contributor.editorCedergren, Jonas
dc.contributor.editorKuehne, Christian
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-0636
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-554X
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6415-4904
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5867-5057
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-0757
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-13T10:12:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T14:07:28Z
dc.date.available2024-12-13T10:12:28Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractHeterobasidion root and butt rot pose a greater risk in continuous cover forestry (CCF) than in rotation forestry (RF) in conifer-dominated forests, regardless of whether selective, gap or shelterwood cutting is used. Damage from wind, snow, spruce bark beetle, and large pine weevil are likely to be less severe in CCF than in RF. However, the conversion of RF to CCF may briefly expose stands to windthrow. Browsing by large herbivores on saplings may limit regeneration of tree species other than spruce in continuous cover forestry and reduce tree species diversity, but alternative silvicultural practices may also increase forage availability in the field and shrub layer. Browsing damage outcomes for saplings in CCF are difficult to predict. For many types of damage in CCF, substantial knowledge gaps complicate the assessment of damage risk.
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerangep. 221-241
dc.identifier.citationHow to cite: Hantula, J. et al. (2025). Forest Damage. In: Rautio, P., Routa, J., Huuskonen, S., Holmström, E., Cedergren, J., Kuehne, C. (eds) Continuous Cover Forestry in Boreal Nordic Countries. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70484-0_12
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-031-70483-3
dc.identifier.olddbid498206
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/555634
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/24680
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70484-0_12
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe20241213102510
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.discipline1181
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa2 = Osittain avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.doi10.1007/978-3-031-70484-0_12
dc.relation.ispartofContinuous Cover Forestry in Boreal Nordic Countries
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/555634
dc.subjectabiotic damage
dc.subjectHeterobasidion root rot
dc.subjectforest disease
dc.subjectEuropean spruce bark beetle
dc.subjectcervid damage
dc.teh41001-00035201
dc.titleForest damage
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A3 Kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa|sv=A3 Del av bok eller annat samlingsverk|en=A3 Book section, Chapters in research books|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
978-3-031-70484-0_12.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
978-3-031-70484-0_12.pdf

Kokoelmat