Luke
 

Consumer choice of broiler meat : the effects of country of origin and production methods

dc.contributor.authorPouta, Eija-
dc.contributor.authorHeikkilä, Jaakko-
dc.contributor.authorForsman-Hugg, Sari-
dc.contributor.authorIsoniemi, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMäkelä, Johanna-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Talous- ja yhteiskuntatieteellinen tutkimus (TAY)-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Talous- ja yhteiskuntatieteellinen tutkimus (TAY)-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Talous- ja yhteiskuntatieteellinen tutkimus (TAY)-
dc.contributor.departmentNational Consumer Research Centre-
dc.contributor.departmentNational Consumer Research Centre-
dc.date.accepted2012-01-19-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T11:08:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T19:44:15Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T11:08:45Z
dc.date.created2010-04-19-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.description.abstractAn increasing interest and concern among consumers in the ways in which food is produced has led to a need for differentiation in production methods in directions valued by consumers. In this study we used a choice experiment to analyse the importance of the production method, such as organic production and methods emphasising animal welfare or consumer health, and country of origin on the selection of broiler meat by Finnish consumers. The results revealed very strong positive perceptions of domestically produced broiler products. The effect of production method was significant but minor. Emphasising animal welfare in production particularly increased the probability of consumer choice. We also tested the effect of providing production information either in labels or verbally, and found that well-established labels have positive impacts whereas non-familiar labels may be counter-productive. Latent class analysis revealed the heterogeneity of consumer preferences, but did not facilitate the profiling of consumer groups based on socioeconomic data.en
dc.description.dacok-
dc.description.stav-
dc.description.vuosik2010-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange539-546-
dc.identifier.olddbid417703
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/476721
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/35789
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFood quality and preference-
dc.relation.issn0950-3293-
dc.relation.numberinseries5-
dc.relation.volume21-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/476721
dc.subject.agriforsbroilerinliha-
dc.subject.agriforssiipikarjanliha-
dc.subject.agriforsalkuperä-
dc.subject.agriforskuluttajat-
dc.subject.agriforskuluttajakäyttäytyminen-
dc.subject.finagriMa-
dc.subject.finagriRe-
dc.subject.ftechoice experiment-
dc.subject.ftelatent class analysis-
dc.subject.ftepreference heterogeneity-
dc.teh31050015-
dc.titleConsumer choice of broiler meat : the effects of country of origin and production methods-
dc.typeb-
dc.type.bib1. Asiantuntijatarkastetut tieteelliset artikkelit-
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat