Luke
 

Is the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance

dc.contributor.authorKumeh, Eric Mensah
dc.contributor.authorRamcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310210
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-545X
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T07:53:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T20:27:35Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T07:53:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThis paper critically examines the European Union’s (EU) role in tropical deforestation and the bloc’s actions to mitigate it. We focus on two EU policy communications aimed at the challenge: stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests and the EU updated bioeconomy strategy. In addition, we refer to the European Green Deal, which articulates the bloc’s overarching vision for sustainability and transformations. We find that by casting deforestation as a production problem and a governance challenge on the supply side, these policies deflect attention from some of the key drivers of tropical deforestation—the EU’s overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities and asymmetric market and trade power relations. The diversion allows the EU unfettered access to agro-commodities and biofuels, which are important inputs to the EU’s green transition and bio-based economy. Upholding a ‘sustainability image’ within the EU, an overly business-as-usual approach has taken precedence over transformative policies, enabling multinational corporations to run an ecocide treadmill, rapidly obliterating tropical forests. Whereas the EU's plan to nurture a bioeconomy and promote responsible agro-commodities production in the global South are relevant, the bloc is evasive in setting firm targets and policy measures to overcome the inequalities that spring from and enable its overconsumption of deforestation-related commodities. Drawing on degrowth and decolonial theories, we problematise the EU’s anti-deforestation policies and highlight alternative ideas that could lead to more just, equitable and effective measures for confronting the tropical deforestation conundrum.
dc.description.vuosik2023
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.identifier.olddbid495869
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/553308
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/10088
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023032833454
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline519
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationon
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11625-023-01302-7
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSustainability Science
dc.relation.issn1862-4065
dc.relation.issn1862-4057
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/553308
dc.subjectSocio-ecological conficts
dc.subjectDecolonial environmental justice
dc.subjectTransformations
dc.subjectJust globe
dc.teh41007-00198001
dc.titleIs the EU shirking responsibility for its deforestation footprint in tropical countries? Power, material, and epistemic inequalities in the EU’s global environmental governance
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Mensah_KumehandRamcilovic-Suominen_2023.pdf
Size:
888.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mensah_KumehandRamcilovic-Suominen_2023.pdf

Kokoelmat