Luke
 

The implications of management practices on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in biogas production

dc.contributor.authorLehtoranta, Suvi
dc.contributor.authorTampio, Elina
dc.contributor.authorRasi, Saija
dc.contributor.authorLaakso, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorVikki, Karetta
dc.contributor.authorLuostarinen, Sari
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211210
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211210
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211210
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100211210
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-4492
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0855-5073
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T12:21:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T08:32:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T12:21:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBiogas production is seen as one of the key measures in circular economy providing several benefits for the environment. In practice, however, these benefits may not be achieved if the production is not implemented and managed in ways that reduce gaseous emissions. Thus, this study aimed at highlighting how different management practices impact the climate during the life cycle of biogas production in comparison to management without biogas production (reference). Advanced, more emission-reducing practices resulted in 97–107% and conventional practices in 57–75% less emissions when biogas was utilized as transport fuel. If biogas was utilized in CHP (combined heat and power production), the emission reductions were 67–74% and 13–30%, respectively. This reflects the fact that inefficient practices can lead to minimal emission reduction without achieving the desired climate benefit in comparison to the reference. On the European level, this may also mean that the emission reduction demands of RED II (Renewable Energy Directive) regulation are not met. Therefore, when supporting biogas production with public funds, assurance of using emission-reducing practices should be made a prerequisite.
dc.description.vuosik2024
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange11 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid497696
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/555125
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/14264
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121884
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2024080563763
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1172
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa2 = Osittain avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.relation.articlenumber121884
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121884
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of environmental management
dc.relation.issn0301-4797
dc.relation.issn1095-8630
dc.relation.volume366
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/555125
dc.subjectbiogas
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectmethane
dc.subjectemissions
dc.subjectLCA
dc.subjectREDII
dc.teh41007-00207201
dc.titleThe implications of management practices on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in biogas production
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Lehtoranta_etal_2024_Journal_of_environmental_management_The_implications_.pdf
Size:
3.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Lehtoranta_etal_2024_Journal_of_environmental_management_The_implications_.pdf

Kokoelmat