Luke
 

Carbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland—life cycle assessment

dc.contributor.authorUsva, Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorSinkko, Taija
dc.contributor.authorSilvenius, Frans
dc.contributor.authorRiipi, Inkeri
dc.contributor.authorHeusala, Hannele
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.departmentid4100310810
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-7012
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T07:00:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T18:19:27Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T07:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPurpose Coffee is one of the most widely grown cash crops globally, but there are few scientific articles on its carbon footprint and water scarcity impacts. The aim of this study was to assess the carbon footprint and water scarcity impacts throughout the life cycle of the coffee chain (cradle-to-grave) and to identify the most important sources of the impacts (hotspots). Methods The system included all the key stages of the supply chain from land use change and coffee cultivation to roasting and household consumption. Primary data was collected from eight coffee cultivation farms in Brazil, Nicaragua, Colombia and Honduras and coffee roastery and packaging manufacturers in Finland. The AWARE method was applied in a water scarcity impact assessment. Results and discussion The carbon footprint varied from 0.27 to 0.70 kg CO2 eq/l coffee. The share of the coffee cultivation stage varied from 32 to 78% and the consumption stage from 19 to 49%. The use of fertilizers was the most important process contributing to the carbon footprint. Furthermore, deforestation-related emissions notably increased the carbon footprint of coffee from Nicaragua. Compared with the previous literature, our results indicate a relatively larger share of climate impacts in the cultivation stage and less during consumption. The water scarcity impact was relatively low for non-irrigated systems in Central America, 0.02 m3 eq/l coffee. On Brazilian farms, irrigation is a major contributor to the water scarcity impact, varying from 0.15 to 0.27 m3 eq/l coffee. Conclusions Improving the management practices in cultivation and fertilization is key for lower GHG emissions. Irrigation optimization is the most important mitigation strategy to reduce water scarcity impact. However, actions to reduce these two impacts should be executed side by side to avoid shifting burdens between the two.
dc.description.vuosik2020
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange1976-1990
dc.identifier.olddbid488765
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/546226
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/5719
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2020090367307
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationei
dc.okm.discipline1172
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.openaccess2 = Hybridijulkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt avoin julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11367-020-01799-5
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational journal of life cycle assessment
dc.relation.issn0948-3349
dc.relation.issn1614-7502
dc.relation.volume25
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/546226
dc.subject.ysoLife cycle assessment
dc.subject.ysoLCA
dc.subject.ysocoffee
dc.subject.ysowater scarcity
dc.subject.ysowater footprint
dc.subject.ysocarbon footprint
dc.titleCarbon and water footprint of coffee consumed in Finland—life cycle assessment
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Usva_et_al_2020.pdf
Size:
895.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Usva_et_al_2020.pdf

Kokoelmat