Luke
 

Risk classification in animal disease prevention: Who benefits from differentiated policy?

dc.contributor.authorNiemi, Jarkko K.-
dc.contributor.authorLyytikäinen, Tapani-
dc.contributor.authorSahlström, Leena-
dc.contributor.authorVirtanen, Terhi-
dc.contributor.authorLehtonen, Heikki-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Yritystalous YTT / Yritystalous (YRI)-
dc.contributor.department(Evira)-
dc.contributor.department(Evira)-
dc.contributor.department(Evira)-
dc.contributor.departmentMaa- ja elintarviketalouden tutkimuskeskus (MTT) / TAL Taloustutkimus / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat MTP / Maatalouspolitiikka ja markkinat (MPO)-
dc.date.accepted2009-08-05-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T11:06:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T20:34:56Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T11:06:44Z
dc.date.created2009-08-05-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.description.abstractRisk classification of livestock farms can help stakeholders design and implement risk management measures according to the possessed risk. Our goal is to examine how differently pig farms may contribute to the societal costs of an animal disease outbreak, how valuable this information is to different stakeholders, and how it can be used to target risk management measures. We show that the costs of an outbreak starting from a certain farm can be quantified for the entire sector using bio-economic models. In further studies, this quantified risk can be differentiated so that farms and slaughterhouses internalise the full cost of risk in production decisions and inhibit animal densities, animal contact structures or other characteristics which pose a threat to the sector. Potential benefits due to risk classification could be received by society and producers, and in the long run also by consumersen
dc.description.dacok-
dc.description.stav-
dc.formatVerkkojulkaisu-
dc.format.bitstreamfalse
dc.format.pagerange28 p-
dc.identifier.olddbid416585
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/475603
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/36508
dc.identifier.urlhttp://purl.umn.edu/49307-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher.placeus-
dc.relation.conferenceAgricultural and Applied Economics Association, Annual Meeting; Milwaukee, 2009-
dc.relation.ispartofAgricultural and Applied Economics Association, Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin-
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/475603
dc.subject.agriforsriskit-
dc.subject.agriforsriskienhallinta-
dc.subject.agriforseläintaudit-
dc.subject.agriforssimulointi-
dc.subject.agriforstappiot-
dc.subject.agriforsemakot-
dc.subject.agriforslihasika-
dc.subject.agriforshinnat-
dc.subject.agrovocrisk-
dc.subject.agrovocanimal diseases-
dc.subject.agrovocsimulation-
dc.subject.agrovoclosses-
dc.subject.agrovocsows-
dc.subject.agrovocswine-
dc.subject.agrovocprices-
dc.subject.finagriMa-
dc.subject.fterisk classification-
dc.subject.ftedynamic programming-
dc.subject.ftepartial-equilibrium-
dc.subject.keywordtaloudellinen vastuu-
dc.teh21100020-
dc.titleRisk classification in animal disease prevention: Who benefits from differentiated policy?-
dc.typeSelected paper-
dc.type.bib2. Muut tieteelliset artikkelit-
dc.type.okmfi=B3 Vertaisarvioimaton artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa|sv=B3 Icke-referentgranskad artikel i konferenspublikation|en=B3 Non-refereed conference proceedings|-

Tiedostot

Kokoelmat