Luke
 

Evaluation of the productivity and costs of excavator-based mechanized tree planting in Finland based on automated data collection

dc.contributor.authorKemppainen, Kalle
dc.contributor.authorKärhä, Kalle
dc.contributor.authorLaitila, Juha
dc.contributor.authorSairanen, Antti
dc.contributor.authorKankaanhuhta, Ville
dc.contributor.authorViiri, Heli
dc.contributor.authorPeltola, Heli
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.departmentid4100210610
dc.contributor.departmentid4100110310
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3319
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5972
dc.contributor.organizationLuonnonvarakeskus
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T07:57:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T12:31:00Z
dc.date.available2025-05-09T07:57:48Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe poor cost-effectiveness of mechanized planting (MECP) is the main reason for the low mechanization rate of planting. In this study, we investigated the productivity of the mechanized excavator-based planting of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] H. Karst.) seedlings based on data collected by the Risutec Asta documentation system. We also compared the costs of a MECP chain with two different manual planting (MAP) chains, where mounding was carried out by a crawler excavator (EXC) or a continuously advancing mounder (CONT). The MECP of seedlings was carried out using an EXC equipped with a Risutec PM-160 planting device. Generally, the nine study sites in western Finland contained few surface obstacles (e.g., the logging residues had mainly been harvested), which made the conditions very suitable for MECP. The average production time taken by the MECP was 9 h ha–1. The operating hour (G15-h) productivity averaged 215 seedlings G15-h−1, with the mean planting time being 13.8 s seedling−1. Loading 160 seedlings into the seedling cassette took approximately 10 min (3.8 s seedling−1). Overall, the cost of the MECP was about 3% lower than for the EXC + MAP. However, when productivity was set at <210 seedlings G15-h−1, the cost of the MECP was higher than that of the EXC + MAP. Based on our findings, the most cost-efficient planting chain was CONT + MAP. However, based on our results, the required level of productivity can be achieved if the sites are suitable for MECP and the machine operators are skilled.
dc.format.bitstreamtrue
dc.format.pagerange23 p.
dc.identifier.olddbid498929
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/556353
dc.identifier.urihttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/11111/22624
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25004
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025050939616
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.avoinsaatavuuskytkin1 = Avoimesti saatavilla
dc.okm.corporatecopublicationon
dc.okm.discipline4112
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationei
dc.okm.julkaisukanavaoa1 = Kokonaan avoimessa julkaisukanavassa ilmestynyt julkaisu
dc.okm.selfarchivedon
dc.publisherSuomen metsätieteellinen seura
dc.relation.doi10.14214/sf.25004
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSilva fennica
dc.relation.issn0037-5330
dc.relation.issn2242-4075
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume59
dc.rightsCC BY-SA 4.0
dc.source.identifierhttps://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/556353
dc.subjectcost-efficiency
dc.subjectforest regeneration
dc.subjectmechanization
dc.subjectplanting machine
dc.subjectsite preparation
dc.subjectsite selection
dc.tehOHFO-Alku-4
dc.titleEvaluation of the productivity and costs of excavator-based mechanized tree planting in Finland based on automated data collection
dc.typepublication
dc.type.okmfi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research|
dc.type.versionfi=Publisher's version|sv=Publisher's version|en=Publisher's version|

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kemppainen_etal_2025_SF_Evaluation_of_the_productivity.pdf
Size:
2.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Kemppainen_etal_2025_SF_Evaluation_of_the_productivity.pdf

Kokoelmat