Luke
 

Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration: Rereading Stephen Jay Gould

Routledge
2024
Helama_2024_TheolSci_Nonoverlapping_Magisteria_Versus.pdf
Helama_2024_TheolSci_Nonoverlapping_Magisteria_Versus.pdf - Publisher's version - 1.33 MB
How to cite: Helama, S. (2024). Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration: Rereading Stephen Jay Gould. Theology and Science, 22(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2351648

Tiivistelmä

The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. However, it is commonly neglected that NOMA also permits dialogue and even integration of scientific and religious inputs at the personal level, i.e. beyond the level of magisteria. To distinguish the two levels, it is essential to note that Gould considered the magisteria not as any kind of domain but closely related to teaching authorities.

ISBN

OKM-julkaisutyyppi

A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Julkaisusarja

Theology and science

Volyymi

22

Numero

2

Sivut

Sivut

393-406

ISSN

1474-6700
1474-6719