Context-dependent effects of deer on aboveground carbon stocks in the regenerative tree layer in temperate and boreal forests: A meta-analysis
Elsevier
2025
LeanderOh_etal_2025_GlobalEcolCons.pdf - Publisher's version - 3.52 MB
How to cite: Klara Leander Oh, Gunnar Austrheim, Julien Beguin, Marcin Churski, Steeve D. Côté, Anders L. Kolstad, Dries P.J. Kuijper, A.T. (Loek) Kuiters, Jeffery L. Larkin, Halie A. Parker Larkin, Stanisław Miścicki, Ramón Perea, Linda K. Jensen, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska, Juan Ignacio Ramirez, Jouni Siipilehto, Pieter A. Slim, Jean-Pierre Tremblay, Laurent De Vriendt, Katariina E.M. Vuorinen, Mariska te Beest, Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt, Context-dependent effects of deer on aboveground carbon stocks in the regenerative tree layer in temperate and boreal forests: A meta-analysis, Global Ecology and Conservation, Volume 64, 2025, e03961, ISSN 2351-9894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03961.
Pysyvä osoite
Tiivistelmä
Herbivores, including deer (Cervidae), influence ecosystem functions and carbon cycling by affecting vegetation structure and composition. Given the increase in deer populations in Europe and North America, there is growing interest in their impact on carbon dynamics in temperate and boreal forests. We investigated the effects of deer on carbon stored in the seedling and sapling layer through two mechanisms: (1) deer affecting the overall aboveground woody biomass in these strata and (2) deer changing the composition of tree species in these strata, because species differ in wood density and carbon content. We performed a meta-analysis of 17 datasets from 12 cases, assessing the effects of deer exclusion on aboveground carbon stocks within the seedling and sapling layer (≤ 3 m) under two scenarios of carbon calculation, where we used either: (1) species-specific carbon content and wood density values (mean scenario) and (2) generic carbon content and wood density values (neutral scenario). Most cases reported inconclusive effects of deer exclusion on aboveground carbon stocks, regardless of species-specific carbon content or wood density values. A total of 35 % of cases showed positive outcomes, indicating that an increase in carbon stocks within deer exclosures. Despite the short duration of cases, and high variation in effect sizes between them, we still found a small, significant difference between coniferous- and deciduous-dominated forest systems. The among-case variability in effects suggests a complex interaction between the impact of deer browsing and forest carbon. Understanding these interactions is vital to assess wildlife-carbon relations and to develop appropriate forest conservation approaches in response to growing deer populations.
ISBN
OKM-julkaisutyyppi
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Julkaisusarja
Global Ecology and Conservation
Volyymi
64
Numero
Sivut
Sivut
15 p.
ISSN
2351-9894
