Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Henkilökunnan kirjautuminen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

Boreal forest multifunctionality under varying harvesting intensity and forest management priorities

Hohti, Jani; Eyvindson, Kyle; Kotiaho, Janne S.; Mönkkönen, Mikko (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
s10342-024-01747-0.pdf (1.256Mt)
Lataukset 

URI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-024-01747-0

Hohti, Jani
Eyvindson, Kyle
Kotiaho, Janne S.
Mönkkönen, Mikko

Julkaisusarja
European journal of forest research

Volyymi
144

Sivut
149-162


Springer Nature
2025

How to cite: Hohti, J., Eyvindson, K., Kotiaho, J.S. et al. Boreal forest multifunctionality under varying harvesting intensity and forest management priorities. Eur J Forest Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-024-01747-0

doi:10.1007/s10342-024-01747-0
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024112997592
Tiivistelmä
Forestry is often directed towards conflicting targets. In Finland, forest policy has aimed to extract as much timber as possible while ensuring continued future harvesting opportunities. Concurrently, there is a social demand for biodiversity and non-timber ecosystem services. To explore the opportunities to combine these interests we simulated forest growth and optimized forestry, for a 100 year period, under two scenarios. The first scenario presents the impact economically oriented forestry (maximizing net present value (NPV)) will have on forest multifunctionality. Whereas the second scenario illustrates forest multifunctionality under environmentally oriented forestry (maximum multifunctionality (MF)). Both scenarios applied three harvest intensities (60%, 80% and 100% of the maximum maintainable yield). To evaluate multifunctionality, we used ecosystem service indicators (bilberry yield and carbon storage) and biodiversity indicators (volume of dead wood and habitat suitability for six vertebrate species). Additionally, we estimated the economic benefit from forestry (NPV). Our results showed enhanced forest multifunctionality due to the use of MF management, which appears to be a cost-efficient tool to promote biodiversity and multifunctionality. This trend could be further enhanced by decreasing harvest intensity. Solutions to this trade-off is very much value based and hence requires identification of priorities and preferences from the society.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [87133]
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus