Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Henkilökunnan kirjautuminen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

Comparison between three different delivery technologies of virtual nature on psychological state related to general stress recovery: An experimental study

Kari, Tuomas; Ojala, Ann; Kurkilahti, Mika; Tyrväinen, Liisa (2024)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Kari_etal_2024_JEnvPsych_Comparison_between_three.pdf (1.921Mt)
Lataukset 

URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102452

Kari, Tuomas
Ojala, Ann
Kurkilahti, Mika
Tyrväinen, Liisa

Julkaisusarja
Journal of environmental psychology

Volyymi
100

Sivut
12 p.


Academic Press
2024

How to cite: Kari, T., Ojala, A., Kurkilahti, M., & Tyrväinen, L. (2024). Comparison between three different delivery technologies of virtual nature on psychological state related to general stress recovery: An experimental study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 100, 102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102452

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102452
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024112797146
Tiivistelmä
Visiting nature has been shown to have several benefits for psychological state related to general stress recovery. However, for many people, access to nature is limited. Technological development has made it possible to deliver nature environments virtually. The present study examines the benefits of a same virtual nature (forest) environment delivered through different technologies on psychological state related to general stress recovery, more precisely, on restoration, current stress, subjective vitality, and affective response. The main focus is on comparing three different delivery technologies of virtual nature: TV (75″), VR headset (Meta Quest 2), and virtual nature room (30 m2). The study applies a three-condition randomized trial with pre-post assessments and a crossover design, where 62 participants visited once in each condition for a 15-min exposure of virtual nature (360-degree video with congruent soundscape). The participants responded to psychological measures before and after each condition. Overall, participants’ restoration increased, while current stress and negative affect decreased during the exposure. In comparison to the TV (control) condition, both the VR headset condition and the virtual nature room condition had a better impact on psychological state related to general stress recovery, as restoration and subjective vitality increased more. There were no statistically significant differences between the VR headset and virtual nature room conditions in any of the measures.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [87108]
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus