Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Henkilökunnan kirjautuminen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

The impact of tourist destinations on wildlife in northern Finland

Huhta, Esa (2024)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Huhta_2024_Ecosci_The_impact_of_tourist_destinations.pdf (2.714Mt)
Lataukset 

URI
https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2024.2374061

Huhta, Esa

Julkaisusarja
Ecoscience

Volyymi
31

Numero
1-2

Sivut
26-36


Taylor & Francis
2024

How to cite: Huhta, E. (2024). The impact of tourist destinations on wildlife in northern Finland. Écoscience, 31(1–2), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2024.2374061

doi:10.1080/11956860.2024.2374061
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024082065689
Tiivistelmä
Increased tourism impact, recreational activities and structures in natural areas can affect wildlife by increasing urbanization, landscape fragmentation and disturbance. I examined the potential effects of tourist destinations on four forest grouse (Tetraoninae) and five mammalian species in northern Finland. I analyzed density data obtained from wildlife counts carried out by hunters around ten tourist destinations. The densities of mountain hare and mustelid species were negatively correlated with the distance to a tourist destination. The densities of adult grouse, juvenile grouse, mountain hare, and mustelids were positively correlated with the area of mixed forests surrounding the destinations. The densities of adult and juvenile grouse were positively correlated, while the densities of pine marten and mustelids were negatively correlated with the area of agricultural land surrounding the destinations. The densities of the studied wildlife species varied among destinations and years. It seems that current recreational activities have not caused significant changes in the occurrence and abundance of wildlife species in the surroundings of the tourist destinations studied. Location of a destination, predator densities, and landscape structure around the destination had the most impact on the density of wildlife species.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [87088]
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta
jukuri@luke.fi | Saavutettavuusseloste | Tietosuojailmoitus