Food purchase behaviour in a Finnish population: patterns, carbon footprints and expenditures
Meinilä, Jelena; Hartikainen, Hanna; Tuomisto, Hanna L.; Uusitalo, Liisa; Vepsäläinen, Henna; Saarinen, Merja; Kinnunen, Satu; Lehto, Elviira; Saarijärvi, Hannu; Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti; Erkkola, Maijaliisa; Nevalainen, Jaakko; Fogelholm, Mikael (2022)
Meinilä, Jelena
Hartikainen, Hanna
Tuomisto, Hanna L.
Uusitalo, Liisa
Vepsäläinen, Henna
Saarinen, Merja
Kinnunen, Satu
Lehto, Elviira
Saarijärvi, Hannu
Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti
Erkkola, Maijaliisa
Nevalainen, Jaakko
Fogelholm, Mikael
Julkaisusarja
Public Health Nutrition
Volyymi
25
Numero
11
Sivut
3265-3277
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2022
How to cite: Meinilä J, Hartikainen H, Tuomisto HL, et al. Food purchase behaviour in a Finnish population: patterns, carbon footprints and expenditures. Public Health Nutrition. 2022;25(11):3265-3277. doi:10.1017/S1368980022001707
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024102185754
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024102185754
Tiivistelmä
Objective: To identify food purchase patterns and to assess their carbon footprint
and expenditure.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Purchase patterns were identified by factor analysis from the annual
purchases of 3435 product groups. The associations between purchase patterns
and the total purchases’ carbon footprints (based on life-cycle assessment) and
expenditure were analysed using linear regression and adjusted for nutritional
energy content of the purchases.
Participants: Loyalty card holders (n 22 860) of the largest food retailer in Finland.
Results: Eight patterns explained 55 % of the variation in food purchases. The
Animal-based pattern made the greatest contribution to the annual carbon footprint, followed by the Easy-cooking, and Ready-to-eat patterns. High-energy,
Traditional and Plant-based patterns made the smallest contribution to the carbon
footprint of the purchases. Animal-based, Ready-to-eat, Plant-based and High energy patterns made the greatest contribution, whereas the Traditional and
Easy-cooking patterns made the smallest contribution to food expenditure.
Carbon footprint per euros spent increased with stronger adherence to the
Traditional, Animal-based and Easy-cooking patterns.
Conclusions: The Animal-based, Ready-to-eat and High-energy patterns were
associated with relatively high expenditure on food, suggesting no economic
barrier to a potential shift towards a plant-based diet for consumers adherent to
those patterns. Strong adherence to the Traditional pattern resulted in a low
energy-adjusted carbon footprint but high carbon footprint per euro. This suggests
a preference for cheap nutritional energy rather than environment-conscious pur chase behaviour. Whether a shift towards a plant-based pattern would be afford able for those with more traditional and cheaper purchase patterns requires more
research.
and expenditure.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Purchase patterns were identified by factor analysis from the annual
purchases of 3435 product groups. The associations between purchase patterns
and the total purchases’ carbon footprints (based on life-cycle assessment) and
expenditure were analysed using linear regression and adjusted for nutritional
energy content of the purchases.
Participants: Loyalty card holders (n 22 860) of the largest food retailer in Finland.
Results: Eight patterns explained 55 % of the variation in food purchases. The
Animal-based pattern made the greatest contribution to the annual carbon footprint, followed by the Easy-cooking, and Ready-to-eat patterns. High-energy,
Traditional and Plant-based patterns made the smallest contribution to the carbon
footprint of the purchases. Animal-based, Ready-to-eat, Plant-based and High energy patterns made the greatest contribution, whereas the Traditional and
Easy-cooking patterns made the smallest contribution to food expenditure.
Carbon footprint per euros spent increased with stronger adherence to the
Traditional, Animal-based and Easy-cooking patterns.
Conclusions: The Animal-based, Ready-to-eat and High-energy patterns were
associated with relatively high expenditure on food, suggesting no economic
barrier to a potential shift towards a plant-based diet for consumers adherent to
those patterns. Strong adherence to the Traditional pattern resulted in a low
energy-adjusted carbon footprint but high carbon footprint per euro. This suggests
a preference for cheap nutritional energy rather than environment-conscious pur chase behaviour. Whether a shift towards a plant-based pattern would be afford able for those with more traditional and cheaper purchase patterns requires more
research.
Collections
- Julkaisut [87079]