Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Jukuri etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Jukuri etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

Integrated governance for managing multidimensional problems: Potentials, challenges, and arrangements

Haapasaari, Päivi; Ignatius, Suvi; Pihlajamäki, Mia; Bryhn, Andreas; Sarkki, Simo; Tuomisto, Jouni; Nevalainen, Lauri; Lehikoinen, Annukka; Assmuth, Timo; Romakkaniemi, Atso; Peltonen, Heikki; Kuikka, Sakari (2021)

 
Tweet refworks
 
Avaa tiedosto
Haapasaari_et_al_2021.pdf (618.2Kt)
Lataukset 


Haapasaari, Päivi
Ignatius, Suvi
Pihlajamäki, Mia
Bryhn, Andreas
Sarkki, Simo
Tuomisto, Jouni
Nevalainen, Lauri
Lehikoinen, Annukka
Assmuth, Timo
Romakkaniemi, Atso
Peltonen, Heikki
Kuikka, Sakari

Julkaisusarja
Marine policy

Volyymi
123

Sivut
12 p.


Elsevier Science Ltd.
2021
doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104276
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe20201221101661
Tiivistelmä
The implementation challenge of ecosystem-based (fisheries) management (EB(F)M) has entailed calls for integrated governance (IG) approaches in the marine field. We arranged an expert workshop to study the preconditions and applicability of IG, and to suggest how IG could be arranged in practice. Focusing on the management of the dioxin problem shared by the herring and salmon fisheries in the Baltic Sea, and using a coupled ‘insight network’- SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) methodology, we evaluated two scenarios: 1) IG of herring and salmon fisheries to benefit from collaboration between these fisheries that suffer from the same problem, and 2) IG between the fisheries sector and the food/public health sector to incorporate food safety in fisheries governance. Our results demonstrate that a variety of societal, political, institutional, operational, instrumental, and biological factors affect the applicability of IG in marine contexts, and work as preconditions for IG. While societal needs for IG were obvious in our case, as major challenges for it we identified the competing cross-sectoral objectives, path dependencies, and limitations of experts to think and work across fields. The study suggests that establishing an IG framework by adding new aspects upon the current governance structures may be easier to accept and adapt to, than creating new strategic or advisory bodies or other new capacities. Viewing IG as a framework for understanding cross-sectoral issues instead of one that requires a defined level and form of integrated assessment and management may be a way towards social learning, and thereby towards the implementation of more sophisticated, open and broad EB(F)M frameworks.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [81044]
jukuri@luke.fi | Yhteydenotto | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
jukuri@luke.fi | Yhteydenotto | Saavutettavuusseloste