Hyppää sisältöön
Hakuohjeet
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • På svenska
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Jukuri etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite
  •   Jukuri etusivu
  • Luonnonvarakeskuksen julkaisut
  • Julkaisut
  • Näytä viite

Rehardening capacity in the shoots and buds of three European pear (Pyrus communis [L.]) cultivars following a warm spell in midwinter

Dongxia, Wu; Pauliina, Palonen; Iiris, Lettojärvi; Sanna, Finni; Tuuli, Haikonen; Jaana, Luoranen; Tapani, Repo (2020)

 
Tweet refworks
 
Avaa tiedosto
Wu_et_al_2020.pdf (555.4Kt)
Lataukset 


Dongxia, Wu
Pauliina, Palonen
Iiris, Lettojärvi
Sanna, Finni
Tuuli, Haikonen
Jaana, Luoranen
Tapani, Repo

Julkaisusarja
Scientia horticulturae

Volyymi
273

Sivut
8 p.


Elsevier
2020
doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109638
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2020090969016
Tiivistelmä
The rates of dehardening and rehardening in response to rapid temperature changes in winter are important traits that affect the survival, growth and productivity of the European pear (Pyrus communis [L.]) cultivars in northern countries. The frost hardiness (FH) of shoots of three pear cultivars were studied by a series of freezing tests, after sampling in natural conditions, after dehardening in a growth chamber at 5 °C for 3–4 days (D1) and 16 days (D2), and then after rehardening at −7 °C for 5–7 days (R1 and R2). The FH was assessed by a differential thermal analysis (DTA) to measure the low temperature exotherm (LTE) of shoots, by relative electrolyte leakage (REL) of shoots and by visual damage scoring (VD) of shoots and buds.

According to the DTA, the FH of the cultivars varied between −38 °C (‘Conference’ in D2) and −41 °C (‘Pepi’ in R2). The shoots of the cultivar ‘Pepi’ and ‘Conference’ had the highest and the lowest FH, respectively, in all conditions and methods. All the cultivars had the lowest shoot FH after dehardening in either D1 (between −26 °C and −30 °C by REL and between −28 °C and −30 °C by VD) or D2 (between −38 °C and −40 °C by DTA), and the highest FH after rehardening (R1) preceded by D1 (between −30 °C and −34 °C by REL, and between −29 °C and −32 °C by VD). After the dehardening in D1, the buds did not reharden but continued to deharden (the average FH by VD − 24.5 °C). In the forcing conditions, bud growth was resumed most rapidly in ‘Conference’, indicating a shallower dormancy in this cultivar than in ‘Pepi’ or ‘Clara Frijs’. We conclude that the pear cultivars responded to temperature changes in mid-winter, but less than expected, and the responses were similar in all cultivars.
Collections
  • Julkaisut [81050]
jukuri@luke.fi | Yhteydenotto | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisutyyppitJulkaisuajatUusimmatAsiasanatSivukartta

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
jukuri@luke.fi | Yhteydenotto | Saavutettavuusseloste