Agriculture and food sector in Finland 2019
Toimittajat
Niemi, Jyrki
Väre, Minna
Julkaisusarja
Natural resources and bioeconomy studies
Numero
37/2019
Sivut
103
Natural Resources Institute Finland
2019
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-326-771-8
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-326-771-8
Tiivistelmä
The summer of 2018 will be remembered for the extreme weather conditions in Finland.
The unusual heat and very small rainfall in North and Central Europe caused the
worst drought in two decades. The impacts of drought on the agricultural sector were
significant as many farmers lost at least part of their normal yield due to parched fields.
The impact was the worst in the Nordic and Baltic countries.
Hence, the summer was difficult for agricultural entrepreneurs, but there were also
good news as the EU legislation reducing the occurrence of unfair trading practices
(UTPs) in the food supply chain moved forward. The main objective of the Commission’s
proposal published in April 2018 was ”to protect agricultural producers” because
they are considered ”the weakest link” in the supply chain. Agreeing on the rules
related to UTPs in the food supply chain was one of the important targets the current
EU administration had set itself before the May 2019 elections.
In 2019–2020, the farm policy agenda in Europe is likely to be dominated by reform
proposals which are planned for the next period of the Common Agricultural Policy.
On 1 June 2018, the Commission submitted its legislative proposals for the policy reform
for 2021–2027. The proposals were created based on extensive stakeholder consultations
during the past 18 months.
Also, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU i.e. Brexit remains a central
topic. The terms of future trade relations between the EU and the UK as well as
the details of the withdrawal agreement are still open when writing this. The series of
very complex negotiations, which lasted all year 2018, culminated in November in the
withdrawal agreement between London and Brussels. However, it is still unclear if the
deeply divided British Parliament can approve the negotiated agreement.
The world food market was muddled up by the decisions of the US President Donald
Trump whose trade war with China led to China placing tariffs for US agricultural
products, such as soybeans. That is why the US has been seeking growing markets
from Europe for soybean.
The next pages present a short summary on the events of 2018 and a current outlook
for what to expect from 2019. The special themes of this review highlight particularly
organic production. The thematic articles discuss the development, structure, and
environmental impacts of organic production as well as the world market prospects of
organic products. Other special topics include the competitiveness of the Finnish meat
chain, the investment development of agriculture, the ecosystem services of agriculture
and the reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.
We hope that our readers in and outside Finland will find this review useful.
The unusual heat and very small rainfall in North and Central Europe caused the
worst drought in two decades. The impacts of drought on the agricultural sector were
significant as many farmers lost at least part of their normal yield due to parched fields.
The impact was the worst in the Nordic and Baltic countries.
Hence, the summer was difficult for agricultural entrepreneurs, but there were also
good news as the EU legislation reducing the occurrence of unfair trading practices
(UTPs) in the food supply chain moved forward. The main objective of the Commission’s
proposal published in April 2018 was ”to protect agricultural producers” because
they are considered ”the weakest link” in the supply chain. Agreeing on the rules
related to UTPs in the food supply chain was one of the important targets the current
EU administration had set itself before the May 2019 elections.
In 2019–2020, the farm policy agenda in Europe is likely to be dominated by reform
proposals which are planned for the next period of the Common Agricultural Policy.
On 1 June 2018, the Commission submitted its legislative proposals for the policy reform
for 2021–2027. The proposals were created based on extensive stakeholder consultations
during the past 18 months.
Also, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU i.e. Brexit remains a central
topic. The terms of future trade relations between the EU and the UK as well as
the details of the withdrawal agreement are still open when writing this. The series of
very complex negotiations, which lasted all year 2018, culminated in November in the
withdrawal agreement between London and Brussels. However, it is still unclear if the
deeply divided British Parliament can approve the negotiated agreement.
The world food market was muddled up by the decisions of the US President Donald
Trump whose trade war with China led to China placing tariffs for US agricultural
products, such as soybeans. That is why the US has been seeking growing markets
from Europe for soybean.
The next pages present a short summary on the events of 2018 and a current outlook
for what to expect from 2019. The special themes of this review highlight particularly
organic production. The thematic articles discuss the development, structure, and
environmental impacts of organic production as well as the world market prospects of
organic products. Other special topics include the competitiveness of the Finnish meat
chain, the investment development of agriculture, the ecosystem services of agriculture
and the reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy.
We hope that our readers in and outside Finland will find this review useful.
Collections
- Julkaisut [86778]