Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment
Leung, Brian; Roura-Pascual, Nuria; Bacher, Sven; Heikkilä, Jaakko; Brotons, Lluis; Burgman, Mark A; Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina; Essl, Franz; Hulme, Philip E; Richardson, David M; Sol, Daniel; Vila, Montserrat (2013)
Tätä artikkelia/julkaisua ei ole tallennettu Jukuriin. Julkaisun tiedoissa voi kuitenkin olla linkki toisaalle tallennettuun artikkeliin/julkaisuun.
Leung, Brian
Roura-Pascual, Nuria
Bacher, Sven
Heikkilä, Jaakko
Brotons, Lluis
Burgman, Mark A
Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
Essl, Franz
Hulme, Philip E
Richardson, David M
Sol, Daniel
Vila, Montserrat
Julkaisusarja
Ecology Letters
Volyymi
16
Numero
11
Sivut
1415–e6
Wiley
2013
Kuvaus
Technical Comment
Tiivistelmä
We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practic
Collections
- Julkaisut [85968]